Update from US National Archive on the killing of Archbishop Romero

The following material was garnered from the link "National Security Archive," which has been declassified. It provides details surrounding the murder of Archbishop Oscar A. Romero. The date in the first sentence refers to the 31st anniversary of Romero's death, in 1980.

Washington, D.C., March 23, 2011 - Thirty one years ago tomorrow, El Salvador’s Archbishop Oscar Arnulfo Romero was shot and killed by right-wing assassins seeking to silence his message of solidarity with the country’s poor and oppressed. The assassination shocked Salvadorans already reeling in early 1980 from attacks by security forces and government-backed death squads on a growing opposition movement. Romero’s murder further polarized the country and set the stage for the civil war that would rage for the next twelve years. In commemoration of the anniversary, the National Security Archive is posting a selection from our digital archive of 12 declassified U.S. documents that describe the months before his death, his assassination and funeral, as well as later revelations about those involved in his murder.

The documents are being posted as President Barack Obama leaves El Salvador, his final stop on a five-day trip to Latin America. Obama spent part of his time in the country with a visit to Monsignor Romero’s tomb last night. Although the United States funneled billions of dollars to the tiny country in support of the brutal army and security forces during a counterinsurgency war that left 75,000 civilians dead, the president made no reference to the U.S. role, seeking in his speeches instead to focus on immigration and security concerns. The day before his visit to Romero’s gravesite, Obama had told an audience in Chile that it was important that the United States and Latin America “learn from history, that we understand history, but that we not be trapped by history, because many challenges lie ahead.”

Just weeks before his murder, Archbishop Romero published an open letter to President Jimmy Carter in the Salvadoran press, asking the United States not to intervene in El Salvador’s fate by arming brutal security forces against a popular opposition movement. Romero warned that U.S. support would only “sharpen the injustice and repression against the organizations of the people which repeatedly have been struggling to gain respect for their fundamental human rights.” Despite his plea, President Carter moved to approve $5 million in military aid less than one year after the archbishop’s murder, as Carter was leaving office in January 1981.

Included in the posting are documents reporting on a secret, behind-the-scene effort by the United States to enlist the Vatican in pressuring Romero over his perceived support for the Salvadoran left; an account of the archbishop’s powerful March 23, 1980, homily, given the day before his assassination; a description of the murder by the U.S. defense attaché in El Salvador; and an extraordinary embassy cable describing a meeting organized by rightist leader Roberto D’Aubuisson in which participants draw lots to determine who would be the triggerman to kill Romero.

Although the declassified documents do not reveal the extent of the plot to kill Romero or the names of those who murdered him, details in them support the findings of the 1993 report by the U.N.-mandated Truth Commission for El Salvador. Released shortly after the signing of the peace accords that ended the war in El Salvador, the report identified D’Aubuisson, Captains Alvaro Rafael Saravia and Eduardo Avila, and Fernando (“El Negro”) Sagrera as among those responsible for the assassination. On March 25 of last year, Carlos Dada of El Salvador’s on-line news site El Faro published an extraordinary interview with Alvaro Saravia, one of the masterminds of Romero’s killing. In the interview, Saravia revealed chilling details of the plot to murder Romero; see a transcript of the interview, “How We Killed the Archbishop”, here and here en español.
The documents posted below are from the National Security Archive’s Digital National Security Archive’s two El Salvador collections, El Salvador: The Making of U.S. Policy, 1977–1984 and El Salvador: War, Peace, and Human Rights, 1980–1994. These two full collections, among others, are available through a subscription with the ProQuest research database.

---

Read the Documents
Document 1October 11, 1979
Confidential, Cable, “The Archbishop and the Military”, 2 pp.
United States Embassy. El Salvador
In his homily, Archbishop Romero decries repression by the Salvadoran military and criticizes the army for abandoning its role as the nation’s defender to become “guardian of the interests of the oligarchy.”
Document 2
December 17, 1979
Unclassified, Cable, “Archbishop Strongly Urges Agrarian Reform”, 3 pp.
United States Embassy. El Salvador
Archbishop Oscar A. Romero speaks in support of agrarian reform, criticizing the oligarchy for arming those who seek to preserve the status quo and citing the Catholic Church’s Medellin Council recognition of “right of oppressed to exert pressure, but not through armed violence.”
Document 3
January 31, 1980
Secret, Memorandum, [Draft Letter Attached], “Letter from Dr. Brzezinski to the Pope”, 5 pp.
United States. Department of State, Office of the Secretary
Presents draft of letter to Pope John Paul II outlining areas of concern in Central America and requesting assistance in persuading Archbishop Romero not to "abandon" Revolutionary Governing Junta in favor of more radical leftists in El Salvador.
Document 4
February 19, 1980
Unclassified, Cable, “Text of Archbishop's Letter to President Carter“, 1 pp.
United States Embassy. El Salvador
Archbishop Romero addresses President Jimmy Carter, imploring him not to provide military aid or any other form of assistance that could exacerbate state violence targeting Salvadoran citizens. “I am very worried by the news that the government of the United States is studying a form of abetting the arming of El Salvador,” Romero writes. “The contribution of your government instead of promoting greater justice and peace in El Salvador will without doubt sharpen the injustice and repression against the organizations of the people which repeatedly have been struggling to gain respect for their fundamental human rights.”
Document 5
March 1, 1980
Confidential, Cable, “Reply to Archbishop's Letter to President Carter“,1 pp.
United States Embassy. El Salvador
Secretary of State Cyrus R. Vance responds to Archbishop Romero’s letter regarding criticisms of U.S. security assistance to El Salvador, assuring him that President Carter shares his concerns about the human rights of Salvadoran citizens. “Any equipment and training which we might provide would be designed to overcome the most serious deficiencies of the Armed Forces, enhancing their professionalism so that they can fulfill their essential role of maintaining order with a minimum of lethal force.”
Document 6
March 23, 1980
Confidential, Cable “Archbishop's Homily, March 23”, 4 pp.
United States Embassy. El Salvador
This cable reports on Archbishop Romero’s homily, the day before he was assassinated. He speaks of the increasing tension with Salvadoran security forces and condemns rampant killings: “In the name of God, in the name of this suffering people whose cries rise to heaven more loudly each day, I implore you, I beg you, I order you in the name of God: stop the repression!”
Document 7
March 25, 1980
Confidential, Cable, “Archbishop Romero Assassinated”, 2 pp.
United States Defense Intelligence Agency. Office of the Defense Attaché, El Salvador
This document reports the assassination of Archbishop Romero and includes brief description of events.
Document 8
March 26, 1980
Confidential, Cable, “Archbishop's Assassination: Peaceful Procession”, 2 pp.
United States Embassy. El Salvador
This cable reports on the procession of thousands of people accompanying Archbishop Romero’s coffin from the basilica to the National Cathedral.
Document 9
March 26, 1980,
Unclassified, Cable, “White House Statement on Archbishop Romero's Assassination”, 2 pp.
United States. Department of State
The United States government issues statement condemning the assassination of Archbishop Romero.
Document 10
November 19, 1980,
Secret, Cable “Conversation with National Guard Officer”, 3 pp.
United States Embassy. El Salvador
A source from the National Guard tells a U.S. embassy political officer that National Republican Alliance (Alianza Republicana Nacional—ARENA) founder Roberto D'Aubuisson organized a meeting a day or two before the assassination of Archbishop Romero in which “participants drew lots for the task of killing the archbishop.”
Document 11
February 25, 1981
Unclassified, Cable, “El Salvador: Army Officers Implicated in Romero Killing”, 1 pp.
United States. Foreign Broadcast Information Service, Panama
Radio Venceremos clandestinely broadcasts an interview with “disillusioned army officer” Lt. Col. Ricardo Bruno Navarrete implicating Roberto D'Aubuisson, and members of the Salvadoran armed forces in the assassination of Archbishop Romero.
Document 12
December 21, 1981
Secret, Cable, “Assassination of Archbishop Romero”, 2 pp.
United States Embassy. El Salvador
This document is a follow-up to the November 19 embassy cable concerning a meeting to plan the assassination of Archbishop Romero. In it, a U.S. political officer reports additional information from the same National Guard source indicating that Romero’s killer was Walter “Musa” Antonio Alvarez. [The UN Truth Commission Report on El Salvador would later identify Alvarez as involved in conveying money supplied by Roberto D’Aubuisson as payment to Romero’s assassin, see pp. 130-1.]

“El tal Romero me parece uno del los mas grandes farsantes de la historia de El Salvador. / In my opinion that Romero is one of the biggest phonies in the history of El Salvador”.

"El tal Romero me parece uno de los mas grandes farsantes de la historia de El Salvador / In mi opinion that Romero is one of the biggest phonies in the history of El Salvador".

  

The comment above was made by a Salvadoran just this past week, when we celebrated the 31^st anniversary of Monseñor Romero’s martyrdom. Two days before the anniversary President Obama visited El Salvador

President Obama decided to visit the tomb of Monseñor Romero, something that sparked a lot of controversary and criticism from social organizations as well as from people from the right. Some saw this as a missed opportunity; some said that a better tribute would have been the closing of the school that trained the assassins of Monseñor Romero, the SOA. Others went as far as to say that he was not welcomed at the crypt. (Like if it were Reagan that was doing the visit).

Visiting Monseñor Romero’s tomb, an unprecedented event and great gesture by the first US president ever to visit the tomb , cannot be seen as a missed opportunity. When we look at such sad comments like the one I began with. How can we expect to simply conclude that a better tribute would be the closing of the SOA, especially when Salvadorans themselves do not know the ramification the SOA has had in my country and the rest of Latin America. We must be committed in continuing to raise awareness and speak of the truths. 

I took 4 coworkers (all Salvadoran) of my wife this past Saturday to the Hopitalito and the crypt, these people had never been there, one of them even though Monseñor Romero had been shot at the Cathedral. One of the biggest obstacles we have in El Salvador is that the left has hijacked the image of Monseñor Romero as their own and the right has told lies about him. The left pretends he never denounced their acts and the right doesn’t know he did.

What President Obama did is put the topic of Monseñor Romero on the table in a not so biased way. I have heard people who I know have voted for ARENA before, say that they are now interested in visiting the crypt of Monseñor Romero, even the right wing media has been forced to talk more about Monseñor Romero, more than they would like I am sure.

The wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and now the bombing of Libya have to be condemned as well as any other violation of human rights around the world. The lack of seriousness to address imigration isuues is also not acceptable, but viewing President Obama’s visit to the crypt as negative, in my opinion, is not really a responsible thing to say.  

Monseñor Romero did not only speak the truth he was the truth, we are now more than ever engaged in the fight to recover that truth that has been held hostage for many years by a group of individuals. I would like to reiterate the importance of the visit, yes Obama’s visit was not enough but it was a step in the right direction, and I for one praise it.  We must continue now more than ever speaking of the hope, love and truth that Monseñor Romero was. As the prayer by Simon Barrow, colloquially attributed to Monseñor Romero says, we are all workers not master builders. We are prophets of a future not our own

Francisco Mena Ugarte

CRISPAZ Country Coordinator

CRISPAZ Executive Director to attend SOA event in Washington

Check into The Crispaz Team blog from April 8-11 as CRISPAZ Executive Director reports on this important event from Washington, D.C. CRISPAZ will be onsite at American University throughout the presentations from April 8-10 for the School of the America's Watch program on militarism in the United States.

Help with Japan relief

Christians for Peace in El Salvador (CRISPAZ) currently partners with Network for Good as our nonprofit fundraising provider. Network for Good currently has announced several ways to help provide relief in Japan. Information is below, and you can follow up on links provided if you are interested in helping out. We all join our sisters and brothers in Japan in their current struggles.

http://www1.networkforgood.org/help-survivors-pacific-quake-tsunami (http:/www1.networkforgood.org/help-survivors-pacific-quake-tsunami). AMERICAN RED CROSS: Emergency Operation Centers are opened in the affected areas and staffed by the chapters.
SAVE THE CHILDREN: Mobilizing to provide immediate humanitarian relief in the shape of emergency health care and provision of non-food items and shelter.
GLOBALGIVING: Established a fund to disburse donations to organizations providing relief and emergency services to victims of the earthquake and tsunami.
OXFAM USA: Oxfam is poised to respond if disaster strikes vulnerable countries in its path.

Please send your comments about our new blog, The Crispaz Team

CRISPAZ will offer several updates each week on what is happening in El Salvador, Salvador-related events in the United States, as well as news from Christians for Peace in El Salvador. We are currently gearing up for our summer intern season, when we welcom SIPPIES from across the United States to join us in El Salvador for a two-month immersion program. We hope you will consider joining CRISPAZ this summer.

Welcome to The CRISPAZ Blog

Welcome to the CRISPAZ Blog, carrying updated news and information from Christians for Peace in El Salvador. Today is Monday, March 7. We hope that many of you, especially our ezine subscribers, were able to make calls to Milwaukee-based The Commerce Group to protest their $100 million lawsuit against the government of El Salvador as a result of the cancellation of their mining rights. If you were not able to do so, here is the basic information from our ezine that will get you started.

TELL MINING COMPANY TO DROP THEIR LAWSUIT AGAINST EL SALVADOR

Should a Milwaukee mining company be able to sue the government of El Salvador for enforcing its environmental policies and protecting the health of its people?  Join CRISPAZ and the Midwest Coalition against Lethal Mineral Mining (MCALM) to say no!  Join their call-in to Milwaukee-based Commerce Group :

Please call the Commerce Group's Milwaukee office phone

(414) 462-5310 and tell them to drop the lawsuit against the government of El Salvador. If you can't get through, send them an email at: info@commercegroupcorp.com.

SAMPLE CALL SCRIPT:

Hello. My name is _______________(if you are a Milwaukee or Wisconsin resident, say so up front!) and I have been following Commerce Group's lawsuit  against the government of El Salvador. I am calling on Ed Machulak and the Board of Directors to respect the right of the government of El Salvador to protect the environment and the health of the people near the San Sebastian mine by immediately withdrawing your lawsuit against the government of El Salvador. I will be telling my friends and neighbors about the damage you are causing, as well as calling on my Congressional Representatives to take action. Thank you.

BACKGROUND:

Let's send a clear message to the Commerce Group: Withdraw your shameful lawsuit against El Salvador!

On Wednesday, December 29, 2010, four members (Steve Watrous, Al Gedicks, Babette Grunow and Dan Kasun) of the Midwest Coalition Against Lethal Mining (MCALM) met with John Machulak, an attorney with Machulak, Robertson & Sodos, and brother of Commerce Group's Chairman and CEO Edward Machulak to ask him to withdraw the $100 million lawsuit against El Salvador. He refused.

As Dan Kasun observed, "It appeared obvious that the comments by John Machulak throughout the meeting either attempted to minimize culpability or prove willfully ignorant of the obvious environmental and health impact of the Commerce Group's mining operations."

At the conclusion of the meeting, we promised that if they did not withdraw the lawsuit brought against El Salvador under the foreign investor "protections" of the U.S.-Dominican  Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA) that we would continue our campaign of public education and political pressure.

We need you to stand in solidarity with El Salvador's struggle against corporate extortion, neocolonialism, and environmental racism.

Please call the Commerce Group's Milwaukee office phone (414) 462-5310 on Monday, March 7 and tell them to drop the lawsuit against the government of El Salvador.